Context · Buyer Personas

Not one buyer.

Three distinct decision makers.

kastle.com currently serves all visitors the same experience — one navigation, one hero, one CTA. But CRE property managers, enterprise IT directors, and multifamily operators have fundamentally different pain points, timelines, and evidence requirements. The redesign serves each one deliberately.

3

Primary Personas

CRE, Enterprise IT, Multifamily

90d

Avg Decision Cycle

Multi-stakeholder approval

Content-Led Close Rate

vs. outbound leads (CMI)

0

Current Segmentation

Single path for all buyer types

Buyer Personas

Who is actually coming to kastle.com — and what does each one need that the current site fails to provide?

Personas derived from Kastle's sales team interviews, industry research, and review of job postings on LinkedIn for roles matching Kastle's known buyer profile. These are composite archetypes, not named individuals.


🏢

The CRE Property Manager

VP of Property Operations or Senior Property Manager · CRE firm managing 8–40 buildings

Primary Persona

P1

Who They Are

  • Manages 8–40 commercial properties across a metro area or region

  • Reports to the CFO, COO, or ownership group

  • Responsible for tenant satisfaction, NOI, and operational efficiency

  • Evaluates 3–5 security vendors per year; final decision-maker or key influencer

  • Attends BOMA, IREM, or regional CRE conferences

Their Pain Points

  • Managing 3+ security vendors across different properties

  • 3 a.m. calls when a badge reader fails

  • Tenant complaints about access friction

  • Contractor credential chaos during building renovations

  • No way to see access events across the portfolio in one view

What They Need from the Site

  • Immediate proof that Kastle handles portfolio-scale properties

  • Named case study from a similar-sized CRE firm

  • Specific stat: how many buildings, tenants, credentials managed

  • Evidence of 24/7 support — real people, not a chatbot

  • Simple path to "get a security assessment" — not 13 fields

Current Site Failure Mode

Lands on homepage hero with no CTA. Sees "Managed Security Solutions" headline. Finds a generic contact form with 13 fields. Has no way to confirm Kastle has handled portfolios like theirs. Leaves.

Redesign Solution

CRE entry point in audience-first nav. Hero CTA: "Get a Security Assessment." Case study: named CRE client, specific property count, measurable outcome. 5-field form. Trust signal: "3,600+ properties."

Best Content for This Persona: CRE solution page → "How a 24-Property DC Portfolio Cut Security Costs 35%" (case study) → Occupancy Barometer tool → Security Assessment CTA

💻

The Enterprise IT / Security Director

Director or VP of IT Security · Large enterprise, financial services, or law firm

Primary Persona

P1

Who They Are

  • Responsible for both logical (cyber) and physical (access) security convergence

  • Managing offices in multiple states, sometimes globally

  • Reports to the CISO or CTO; budget authority $500K+

  • Cares deeply about integration: Active Directory, HRIS, identity management

  • Risk-averse; due diligence takes 3–6 months minimum

Their Pain Points

  • Physical and logical access living in separate silos

  • Slow or manual offboarding when employees leave

  • Vendor can't integrate with Azure AD / Okta

  • Compliance audit trails missing for physical access

  • Legacy hardware that "just works" preventing modernization

What They Need from the Site

  • Technical depth: Aliro standard, HRIS integration, Active Directory sync

  • Security compliance documentation (FedRAMP, SOC 2 references)

  • Proof of enterprise scale: number of credentials managed, uptime SLA

  • Case study from a peer organization (financial services, law, professional services)

  • White paper or technical guide for IT evaluation

Current Site Failure Mode

Finds "Enterprise" buried in nav. Solution pages lead with marketing copy, not technical specs. No downloadable integration guide. 13-field form asks for company size upfront — before the buyer is ready to disclose. Bounces to Verkada.

Redesign Solution

Enterprise entry point in primary nav. EverPresence platform page with Aliro/HRIS spec detail. Technical guide gated download (3-field email capture). Security Readiness Assessment — IT-specific variant — routes to enterprise-focused SDR.

Best Content for This Persona: Enterprise IT page → EverPresence platform detail → "Physical Security Integration Checklist" (gated guide) → Peer case study → Technical demo request

🏠

The Multifamily Operator

VP of Operations or Director of Facilities · Apartment REIT or regional multifamily operator

Secondary Persona

P2

Who They Are

  • Operating 500–5,000 units across 5–20 communities

  • Answers to an asset manager or investor group on occupancy and NOI

  • Primary concern: resident experience and retention, not just security

  • Increasingly evaluated by residents on smart home / smart building tech

  • Decision influenced by leasing team (resident complaints) and maintenance staff (ease of use)

Their Pain Points

  • Key management at scale — physical fobs for 2,000 residents

  • Package and delivery access friction for residents

  • Overnight security incidents (tailgating, unauthorized entry)

  • Residents comparing them to competitors with "smart building" features

  • High turnover: re-keying units costs thousands per year per property

What They Need from the Site

  • Mobile credential story: Apple Wallet, Google Wallet, no separate app required

  • VideoGuarding story: overnight monitoring without on-site guards

  • Case study showing improved resident satisfaction scores

  • "Re-keying eliminated" or cost-per-unit comparison against traditional fob systems

  • Visitor management for delivery, service staff, and guests

Current Site Failure Mode

"Multifamily" is buried under Facility Type. The page leads with technology specs. Mobile credential story is there but not hero-level prominent. No resident satisfaction data. Bounces to a competitor with a clearer multifamily story.

Redesign Solution

Multifamily entry point in primary nav. Page leads with: "Residents love mobile credentials. Owners love the cost savings." VideoGuarding prominently featured for overnight coverage story. Resident satisfaction case study above the fold.

Best Content for This Persona: Multifamily landing page → Mobile credentials explainer → VideoGuarding overnight monitoring → "Why residents prefer mobile access" blog post → Security Assessment CTA

🏛️

The Government / Education Facilities Director

Facilities Director or Chief of Security · Federal agency, municipality, or university

Tertiary Persona

P3

Who They Are

  • Operates under procurement regulations (GSA, FISMA, state purchasing rules)

  • Long sales cycles (12–24 months) with RFP requirements

  • Security must meet compliance frameworks (FICAM, FIPS 201, PIV)

  • Budgets are fixed annual allocations — not flexible like private sector

  • Decision committee includes legal, IT, HR, and facilities

Their Pain Points

  • Legacy access control hardware that can't be updated remotely

  • Compliance requirements that most vendors can't meet

  • Need to demonstrate value within fixed budget cycles

  • Cannot tolerate downtime or vendor instability

  • Visitor management for contractors and visiting delegations

What They Need from the Site

  • FISMA compliance documentation prominently available

  • GSA schedule or contract vehicle references

  • FedRAMP or equivalent cloud authorization status

  • Government-specific case studies (agencies, municipalities)

  • Long-term relationship evidence (average client tenure 10+ years)

Current Site Failure Mode

Government is a sub-page buried in "Industries." FISMA and FICAM compliance are not prominent. No GSA schedule reference. No government case studies. The 13-field form asks for everything except the one thing this buyer needs: a compliance briefing.

Redesign Solution

Government & Education as a top-level nav entry. Compliance badges (FISMA, FIPS 201) prominently displayed. "Get a Government Security Assessment" — a distinct CTA variant. Federal case study above the fold. Separate conversion path from the commercial funnel.

Best Content for This Persona: Government & Education page → Compliance documentation → Long-term partnership story → "Get a Government Security Assessment" CTA → Compliance briefing download

Summary Comparison

One Site. Four Journeys.

DimensionCRE Property MgrEnterprise ITMultifamily OperatorGov / Education

Decision timeline

30–90 days

3–6 months

60–120 days

12–24 months

Primary concern

Operational simplicity

Integration & compliance

Resident experience

Regulatory compliance

Content type needed

Named case study + portfolio stats

Technical specs + integration guide

Resident satisfaction + cost ROI

Compliance docs + long-term proof

Hero CTA preference

Get a Security Assessment

Request Technical Demo

See Mobile Credentials in Action

Get a Government Assessment

Ideal nav entry

Commercial Real Estate

Enterprise & Multi-Site

Multifamily Residential

Government & Education

Peer proof that converts

Named CRE firm, # of properties

Named enterprise, integration specifics

Named operator, resident satisfaction score

Named agency, compliance certification

The IA Implication

These four personas share one thing: they all need to self-identify immediately upon arriving at kastle.com. The current site makes them translate Kastle's internal structure into their own reality. The redesign inverts that — the primary navigation says their name first, and everything downstream is tailored to their journey. One site, four clearly marked doors. Every buyer finds their path in under 10 seconds.

Meet Your Buyer

Four doors, one site — live and interactive

Live Demo

Pages → Homepage

Audience segmentation cards visible in the homepage hero. All four entry points live.

Conversion Strategy

Context → Conversion Strategy

Three funnel tiers mapped to each persona's intent stage.

Business Case

Context → Business Case

Nav-by-org-chart problem documented with research citations.

Overview

Context → Overview

P0/P1/P2 prioritization framing for audience-first navigation and conversion flow.

Read Our Vision for the Future  |  View Proposal →